| Competitions Categories, Judges, and Winners |
| . |
General Competitions Information
Judging Criteria
Questions? |
WinnersCompetitions winners, runners-up and honorable mentionsCategories3. How-to-Guides (Printed and Web) 6. CD-ROMs JudgesTo see category judges with their academic affiliations and addresses, please click on category titles above or scroll down this page.
Category
1: A computing organization's
Web site provides users access to a wealth of information and services.
In this category, judges will consider an academic computing organization's
entire Web site. Judging will be based on overall graphic design and
page/site layout, consistency throughout the site, ease of navigation,
ease in finding both general and specific information, appropriateness
and accuracy of information, and accessibility (both in speed and across
platforms and browsers).
John
Supra
A newsletter should be eye-catching, informative and at least a little entertaining to make people want to read it. Judging will be based on design, approachability, quality of content, and visual appeal.
John
Supra Information
Services Division
This category includes Web documents
that are primarily procedural, and provide instructions for accomplishing
computing tasks. Judging will be based on effectiveness of instruction,
appropriate use of the Web as a medium including design and layout and
accessibility (both in speed and across platforms and browsers).
John
Zollinger
Included in this category are printed
documents that are primarily procedural and provide instructions for
accomplishing computing tasks. Judging will be based on design, ease
of use, clarity of instructions, and effective use of illustrations.
Phyllis
Galt
Universities are using a variety of
formats to provide quick printed guides to resources for their computing
users. Most are one page or shorter including but not limited to bookmarks,
magnets, and stickers. Judging will be based on ease of use, visual
appeal, content.
Teresa
Leo Information Systems and
Computing
Many schools are publishing information
about special projects. One function of these publications is to increase
the visibility of the projects in their home institution. Publications
may combine this function with others; as long as more than half of
the publication is project description, it is eligible for this category.
A common focus is on collaborative projects between computing organizations
and faculty to improve the use of technology in the classroom, but other
foci are acceptable in this category. Judging will be based on design,
content, effectiveness.
Janet
Sakell
This category is for CD-ROMs which
contain software and instructions distributed by schools to their students,
faculty and staff. Judging will be based on ease of installation, instructions,
instruction booklet design.
Craig Kawahara
We are moving toward an environment where we publish bare-bones introductory information on paper and put everything else on the Web. There are some challenges to doing this well. What content do you choose for paper and what content do you save for the Web? What kinds of design elements do you use to tie the paper publication to the electronic publication? What audiences can be safely served with this kind of demarcation? In this category, judging will focus on how multi-media publications make best use of printed and Web tools to provide integrated information.
Teresa
M. Craighead |
|
|
|
|