Page updated: March 25, 2001   


28th Annual Computer Services Management Symposium (CSMS 2001)
March 18 - 20, 2001
Program Notes


 
 

 Parallel Session IV Monday, March 19, 2001

Technology Tools for Better Service
Facilitator: Sue Hales, Bucknell University

What technology tools are people using to provide better service? Are there efficient "remote control" software products that assist Help Desk staff? What knowledgebase tools are people using? Are you using network management tools? Server management tools?

   

Session Notes

TECHNOLOGY TOOLS FOR PROVIDING BETTER SERVICE

Overview (the numbers indicate the group's level of interest)

  • Help Desk Systems (8)
  • Remote Management and Support (14)
  • Groupware (1)
  • Automated Call Distribution (ACD) (0)
  • Knowledgebases (9)
  • Server Status Tools (7)
  • Pagers (0)
  • PDA's (6)

Remote Management and Support

Knowledgebases

  • Def: automated tools to search for problem resolutions
  • Types: vendors provide their own (e.g., Microsoft, Apple), unaffiliated web sites (e.g., dogpile.com, support.com), canned knowledgebase products, knowledgebases that come with a Help Desk system (e.g., HEAT, Bridge 99), homegrown (e.g., Indiana U.)
  • if you build your own, it's best to emphasize site-specific content
  • pro of web-enabled kbases: you can link to other resources
  • referring users to kbase has pros and cons (self-sufficiency vs. them feeling brushed off)
  • kbases are good for internal use to provide continuity of knowledge with rapidly changing Help Desk staff

Systems

  • Systems being used by attendees and *rough* cost estimates:
    • HEAT (60K),
    • Clientele (35K),
    • HelpLine (5 figures),
    • Remedy ($140 and up),
    • HelpStar (22K),
    • Peregrine (180K and up),
    • Bridge 99 (<10K),
    • Magic (20K), and
    • homegrown systems based on ASP, Access, and FileMaker.
  • Some are PDA-compatible, and this can be a big help
  • Many can automate emails to users and support staff; helpful
  • Categories for problem types lets you assign different expected resolution timeframes based on type
  • Are such systems actually worth the cost and hassle? Yes, probably.

Server Status Tools

   

Notes prepared by:

Susan Hales
Technology Desk Leader
Information Services & Resources
Bucknell University
Lewisburg, PA 17837
hales@bucknell.edu

 

 


Comments and questions about the CSMS program may be directed to John Bucher, CSMS 2001 Program Chair.